Añadir traducción en paralelo Imprimir Opciones de la página

Special Inheritance Laws

27 [a] Then the daughters of Zelophehad son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh of the families of Manasseh,[b] the son of Joseph came forward. Now these are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. And they stood before Moses and Eleazar the priest and the leaders of the whole assembly at the entrance to the tent of meeting and said, “Our father died in the wilderness, although[c] he was not part of[d] the company of those that gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah, but he died for his own sin,[e] and he had no sons. Why should the name of our father be lost from among his family because he had no son? Give us a possession[f] among the relatives[g] of our father.”

So Moses brought their case before the Lord.

Read full chapter

Notas al pie

  1. Numbers 27:1 sn For additional information on this section, see N. H. Snaith, “The Daughters of Zelophehad,” VT 16 (1966): 124-27; and J. Weingreen, “The Case of the Daughters of Zelophehad,” VT 16 (1966): 518-22.
  2. Numbers 27:1 tc The phrase “of the families of Manasseh” is absent from the Latin Vulgate.
  3. Numbers 27:3 tn This clause begins with a vav (ו) on a pronoun, marking it out as a disjunctive vav. In this context it fits best to take it as a circumstantial clause introducing concession.
  4. Numbers 27:3 tn Heb “in the midst of.”
  5. Numbers 27:3 tn The word order is emphatic: “but in/on account of his own sins he died.”
  6. Numbers 27:4 tn That is, the possession of land, or property, among the other families of their tribe.
  7. Numbers 27:4 tn The word is “brothers,” but this can be interpreted more loosely to relatives. So also in v. 7.