传统与诫命

15 有几个法利赛人和律法教师从耶路撒冷来质问耶稣: “为什么你的门徒吃饭前不行洗手礼,破坏祖先的传统呢?”

耶稣回答说:“为什么你们拘守传统而违背上帝的诫命呢? 上帝说,‘要孝敬父母’,又说,‘咒骂父母的,必被处死。’ 你们却说,‘人如果把供养父母的钱奉献给上帝, 他就不必供养父母。’你们这是用传统来废掉上帝的诫命。

Read full chapter

礼上的污秽

15 那时,有法利赛人和文士从耶路撒冷来见耶稣,说: “你的门徒为什么犯古人的遗传呢?因为吃饭的时候,他们不洗手。” 耶稣回答说:“你们为什么因着你们的遗传,犯神的诫命呢? 神说:‘当孝敬父母’,又说:‘咒骂父母的,必治死他。’ 你们倒说,无论何人对父母说:‘我所当奉给你的已经做了供献’, 他就可以不孝敬父母。这就是你们借着遗传,废了神的诫命!

Read full chapter

傳統與誡命

15 有幾個法利賽人和律法教師從耶路撒冷來質問耶穌: 「為什麼你的門徒吃飯前不行洗手禮,破壞祖先的傳統呢?」

耶穌回答說:「為什麼你們拘守傳統而違背上帝的誡命呢? 上帝說,『要孝敬父母』,又說,『咒罵父母的,必被處死。』 你們卻說,『人如果把供養父母的錢奉獻給上帝, 他就不必供養父母。』你們這是用傳統來廢掉上帝的誡命。

Read full chapter

Breaking Human Traditions

15 Then Pharisees[a] and experts in the law[b] came from Jerusalem to Jesus and said,[c] “Why do your disciples disobey the tradition of the elders? For they don’t wash their[d] hands when they eat.”[e] He answered them,[f] “And why do you disobey the commandment of God because of your tradition? For God said,[g]Honor your father and mother[h] and ‘Whoever insults his father or mother must be put to death.’[i] But you say, ‘If someone tells his father or mother, “Whatever help you would have received from me is given to God,”[j] he does not need to honor his father.’[k] You have nullified the word of God on account of your tradition.

Read full chapter

Footnotes

  1. Matthew 15:1 sn See the note on Pharisees in 3:7.
  2. Matthew 15:1 tn Or “and the scribes.” See the note on the phrase “experts in the law” in 2:4.
  3. Matthew 15:1 tn The participle λέγοντες (legontes) has been translated as a finite verb so that its telic (i.e., final or conclusive) force can be more easily detected: The Pharisees and legal experts came to Jesus in order to speak with him.
  4. Matthew 15:2 tc ‡ Although most witnesses read the genitive plural pronoun αὐτῶν (autōn, “their”), it may have been motivated by clarification (as it is in the translation above). Several other authorities do not have the pronoun, however (א B Δ 073 ƒ1 579 700 892 1424 f g1); the lack of an unintentional oversight as the reason for omission strengthens their combined testimony in this shorter reading. NA28 has the pronoun in brackets, indicating doubts as to its authenticity.
  5. Matthew 15:2 tn Grk “when they eat bread.”
  6. Matthew 15:3 tn Grk “But answering, he said to them.”
  7. Matthew 15:4 tc Most mss (א*,2b C L N W Γ Δ 0106 33 565 1241 1424 M) have an expanded introduction here; instead of “For God said,” they read “For God commanded, saying” (ὁ γὰρ θεὸς ἐνετείλατο λέγων, ho gar theos eneteilato legōn). But such expansions are generally motivated readings; in this case, most likely it was due to the wording of the previous verse (“the commandment of God”) that caused early scribes to add to the text. Although it is possible that other witnesses reduced the text to the simple εἶπεν (eipen, “[God] said”) because of perceived redundancy with the statement in v. 3, such is unlikely in light of the great variety and age of these authorities (א2a B D Θ 073 ƒ1, 13 579 700 892 lat co, as well as other versions and fathers).
  8. Matthew 15:4 sn A quotation from Exod 20:12; Deut 5:16.
  9. Matthew 15:4 sn A quotation from Exod 21:17; Lev 20:9.
  10. Matthew 15:5 tn Grk “is a gift,” that is, something dedicated to God.
  11. Matthew 15:6 tc The logic of v. 5 would seem to demand that both father and mother are in view in v. 6. Indeed, the majority of mss (C L N W Γ Δ Θ 0106 ƒ1 1424 M) have “or his mother” (ἢ τὴν μητέρα αὐτοῦ, ē tēn mētera autou) after “honor his father” here. However, there are significant witnesses that have variations on this theme (καὶ τὴν μητέρα αὐτοῦ [kai tēn mētera autou, “and his mother”] in Φ 565 1241 bo and ἢ τὴν μητέρα [“or mother”] in 073 ƒ13 33 579 700 892), which is usually an indication of a predictable addition to the text rather than an authentic reading. Further, the shorter reading (without any mention of “mother”) is found in early and significant witnesses (א B D a e syc sa). Although it is possible that the shorter reading came about accidentally (due to the repetition of—ερα αὐτοῦ), the evidence more strongly suggests that the longer readings were intentional scribal alterations.tn Grk “he will never honor his father.” Here Jesus is quoting the Pharisees, whose intent is to release the person who is giving his possessions to God from the family obligation of caring for his parents. The verb in this phrase is future tense, and it is negated with οὐ μή (ou mē), the strongest negation possible in Greek. A literal translation of the phrase does not capture the intended sense of the statement; it would actually make the Pharisees sound as if they agreed with Jesus. Instead, a more interpretive translation has been used to focus upon the release from family obligations that the Pharisees allowed in these circumstances.sn Here Jesus refers to something that has been set aside as a gift to be given to God at some later date, but which is still in the possession of the owner. According to contemporary Jewish tradition, the person who made this claim was absolved from responsibility to support or assist his parents, a clear violation of the Mosaic law to honor one’s parents (v. 4).

That Which Defiles(A)

15 Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”(B)

Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’[a](C) and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[b](D) But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.

Read full chapter

Footnotes

  1. Matthew 15:4 Exodus 20:12; Deut. 5:16
  2. Matthew 15:4 Exodus 21:17; Lev. 20:9