back to top
Home Blog Page 25

Guide to the Kings and Prophets of Israel and Judah [Chart] 

Some years ago, a Bible Gateway-associated blogger named Craig T. Owens created a detailed chart of all of the kings and prophets of the united and divided kingdoms of Judah and Israel mentioned in the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles. It’s remained one of our most popular posts ever since. 

It’s easy to see why. When I was researching my article on chronological ordering of the Bible, navigating the timeline of these books was by far the most complicated part. (You’ll notice, if you review that post, that I decided to simplify the task: while I did put the books and prophets in chronological order, I grouped them by United Kingdom, Divided Kingdom, and Exile rather than match them up verse-for-verse.) 

Owens did the work, though, breaking down the complete timeline into incredible detail. Here’s what he had to say about it

One challenging point in history is the divided kingdoms of Israel (the 10 northern tribes) and Judah (the 2 southern tribes). What makes it challenging when reading straight through the Bible [in chronological order] is that the history is covered in 1 and 2 Kings and then again in 1 and 2 Chronicles. In the midst of these kingdoms, several prophets are sent by God. Some of these prophets only have their words recorded in Kings or Chronicles, while others have their words recorded elsewhere in the Bible (usually the book name is the prophet’s name). 

In trying to keep all of these people and messages clear in my mind, I have put together a list of all the kings and prophets during the period of the divided kingdom (roughly 931-586 BC). 

In honor of the seventh anniversary of the completed form of Owens’ chart, I decided to republish it and break it down into a heavily expanded text format as another way to digest the information.  

First, I’ll share the chart again, which packs a ton of information into a super-compact graphic. Then I’ll go through and expand on some of the information, and provide links to the relevant passages. 

Banner reading "Bible Gateway Plus, Less Than $5.00 per month, Free Trial"

Note that all dates are approximate and contested due to the lack of a consistent calendar during this time (as throughout the ancient world).  

Chart of Israel’s and Judah’s Kings and Prophets 

First, the chart itself: 

Chart listing all of the names, dates, and info of the kings and prophets of Judah and Israel in the books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles

Got all that? Now, let’s dig in.

The United Kingdom, ca. 1050-930 BC 

This was the “golden age” of the Israelite’s presence in the holy land throughout the Old Testament. It began with Saul establishing his kingdom after being anointed by the prophet Samuel, progressed through his army captain David’s ascension to the throne (also with Samuel’s blessing), and then through David’s son Solomon’s inheritance and consolidation of the kingdom. 

Saul (r. 1050-1010) 

  • Prophet: Samuel 
  • Scripture: 1 Samuel 8-31, 1 Chronicles 9-10 
  • Summary: Marked by early divine favor and public support, Saul later fell into offering pagan sacrifices and failure to uphold God’s commands, leading God to turn his favor away from Saul’s line and toward Saul’s captain, David. 

David (r. 1010-970) 

  • Prophets: Samuel and Nathan 
  • Scripture: 1 Sam 16-31, 2 Sam 1-24, 1 Kings 1-2, 1 Chron 11-29 
  • Associated works: David is listed as the author of 73 of the Psalms, and probably wrote more. 
  • Summary: Religiously devout and militarily successful, David enjoyed God’s favor throughout most of his life (with the clear exception of his actions toward Bathsheba and Uriah). His conquests established Israel’s empire as a unified power across the region. It was David’s wish to build God’s temple, but God denied him on account of the blood he had spilled. 

Solomon (r. 970-930) 

  • Prophet: Nathan 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 1-11, 2 Chron 1-9 
  • Associated works: Solomon is credited with the books of Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the Song bearing his name, as well as 2 (and possibly more) of the Psalms. 
  • Summary: Famously wise and devoted — it was he who built the temple in Jerusalem, among many other great buildings — Solomon nevertheless besmirched his name through marriages to pagan women and sacrifices to their deities. Because of this, at the end of his reign, God saw fit to divide the kingdom. 

The Divided Kingdom, ca. 931-586 BC 

Before Solomon’s death, his servant Jeroboam rebelled. Though the rebellion itself was a failure, Jeroboam returned after Solomon’s death, when Solomon’s son Rehoboam reigned, and laid claim to the northern kingdom of Israel. The smaller southern kingdom of Judah (which included Jerusalem) remained under Rehoboam. So began the period of the divided kingdom. 

Kingdom of Judah (Southern Kingdom) 

Rehoboam (r. 931-913) 

  • Claim: Son of Solomon 
  • Prophet: Shemaiah 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 12 & 14, 2 Chron 10-12 
  • Notable for: Dividing the kingdom 
  • Evil or good? Evil (he “did what was evil in the sight of the Lord”) 

Abijah (r. 913-911) 

  • Claim: Son of Rehoboam 
  • Prophet: Shemaiah 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 15, 2 Chron 13 
  • Notable for: War with Jeroboam I  
  • Evil or good? Evil (he “committed all the sins that his father did before him”) 

Asa (r. 911-870) 

  • Claim: Son of Abijah 
  • Prophet: Shemaiah and Hanani 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 15, 2 Chron 14-16 
  • Notable for: Being a good and devout king  
  • Evil or good? Good (he “did what was right in the sight of the Lord”) 

Jehoshaphat (r. 870-848) 

  • Claim: Son of Asa 
  • Prophet: Micaiah 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 22, 2 Chron 17-20 
  • Notable for: Making peace with Israel  
  • Evil or good? Good 

Jehoram (r. 848-841) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehoshaphat 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 8, 2 Chron 21 
  • Notable for: Marries the daughter of Ahab of Israel, bringing their idolatry to Judah and drawing plague upon them  
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Ahaziah (r. 841) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehoram 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 8-9, 2 Chron 22 
  • Notable for: Idolatry, and ruling less than a year 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Athaliah (r. 841-835) 

  • Claim: Mother of Ahaziah 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 11, 2 Chron 22-23 
  • Notable for: Being the only woman to rule; also, attempting to kill all her grandchildren 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Jehoash/Joash (r. 835-796) 

  • Claim: Son of Ahaziah (grandson of Athaliah) 
  • Prophet: Joel(?) [Note: Joel is notoriously difficult to place, and could be nearly any time before or after Exile.] 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 11-12, 2 Chron 23-24 
  • Notable for: A long reign beginning at age 7; returned worship to the temple and defeated the Aramaeans but did not depart from idolatry; murdered by his servants 
  • Evil or good? Mixed 

Amaziah (r. 796-767) 

  • Claim: Son of Joash 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 14, 2 Chron 25 
  • Notable for: Reigned long but suffered humiliating defeat after provoking Israel to war; later a victim of a conspiracy for the throne 
  • Evil or good? Mixed 

Uzziah (aka Azariah) (r. 767-748) 

  • Claim: Son of Amaziah 
  • Prophet: Isaiah 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15, 2 Chron 26 
  • Notable for: Very long reign hampered by leprosy 
  • Evil or good? Pretty good 

Jotham (r. 748-732) 

  • Claim: Son of Azariah 
  • Prophet: Isaiah, Micah 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15, 2 Chron 27 
  • Notable for: Not much; he was a good king but failed to stop idolatry 
  • Evil or good? Good 

Ahaz (r. 732-716) 

  • Claim: Son of Jotham 
  • Prophet: Isaiah, Micah 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 16, 2 Chron 28, Isaiah 7 
  • Notable for: Pagan practices, including child sacrifice; becoming vassal state to Assyria 
  • Evil or good? Super evil 

Hezekiah (r. 716-687) 

  • Claim: Son of Ahaz 
  • Prophet: Isaiah, Micah 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 18-20, 2 Chron 29-32, Isaiah 36-39 
  • Notable for: First king of Judah to “remove the high places” and stop idolatry; rebelled against Assyria and regained independence 
  • Evil or good? Very good (“the Lord was with him; wherever he went, he prospered”) 

Manasseh (r.687-642) 

  • Claim: Son of Hezekiah 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 21, 2 Chron 33 
  • Notable for: Very long reign that brought idolatry back to Judah, including child sacrifice; shed “much innocent blood.” But he repented late in life after God rescued him from imprisonment in Babylon and tried to stop the idolatry. 
  • Evil or good? Very evil (he “misled them to do more evil than the nations had done that the Lord destroyed before the people of Israel”), but he ended on a good note 

Amon (r.642-640) 

  • Claim: Son of Manasseh 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 21, 2 Chron 33 
  • Notable for: Returned to his father’s earlier idolatry; killed by his servants 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Josiah (r. 640-608) 

  • Claim: Son of Amon 
  • Prophet: Huldah, Zephaniah, Habakkuk, Jeremiah 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 22-23, 2 Chron 34-35 
  • Notable for: Ending idolatry and bringing back the Law; died in battle against Egypt; last king before exile 
  • Evil or good? Very good (cf. 2 Kings 23:24

Jehoahaz (r. 608) 

  • Claim: Son of Josiah 
  • Prophet: Jeremiah, Lamentations 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 23, 2 Chron 36 
  • Notable for: Reigned three months before he was supplanted and captured by Pharaoh Neco of Egypt 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Jehoiakim (r. 608-597) 

  • Claim: Son of Josiah, brother of Jehoahaz 
  • Prophet: Jeremiah, Lamentations 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 23-24, 2 Chron 36 
  • Notable for: Rebelled (very unsuccessfully) against King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon 
  • Evil or good? Mostly evil 

Jehoiachin (r. 597) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehoiakim 
  • Prophet: Jeremiah, Lamentations 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 24-25, 2 Chron 36 
  • Notable for: Reigned for three months before surrendering to King Nebuchadnezzar 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Zedekiah (r. 597-586) 

  • Claim: Son of Josiah (Jehoiachin’s uncle) 
  • Prophet: Jeremiah, Lamentations 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 24-25, 2 Chron 36 
  • Notable for: Rebelled against Babylon, leading to the sack and destruction of Jerusalem and Solomon’s temple 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

BABYLONIAN EXILE (586-450) 

Kingdom of Israel (Northern Kingdom) 

Jeroboam I (r. 931-910) 

  • Claim: Solomon’s servant 
  • Prophet: Ahijah 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 12-14, 2 Chron 10 
  • Notable for: Seceding from Judah and dividing the kingdom; worshiping golden calves 
  • Evil or good? Evil (he “there was no one who followed the house of David except the tribe of Judah alone”; i.e., not Israel) 

Nadab (r. 910-909) 

  • Claim: Son of Jeroboam 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Not much; killed by countryman during siege of Gibbethon 
  • Evil or good? Evil (he “did what was evil in the sight of the Lord”) 

Baasha (r. 909-886) 

  • Claim: Usurper 
  • Prophet: Jehu 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 15-16 
  • Notable for: Assassinating Nadab, destroying the house of Jeroboam 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Elah (r. 886-885) 

  • Claim: Son of Baasha 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 16 
  • Notable for: Drinking too much and getting murdered by his servant 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Zimri (r. 885) 

  • Claim: Elah’s servant (“commander of half his chariots”) 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 16 
  • Notable for: Shortest reign in the book (seven days); burnt himself alive 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Omri (r. 885-874) 

  • Claim: Commander of the army 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 16 
  • Notable for: Seized power after crisis of succession and moved capital to Samaria 
  • Evil or good? Evil (he “did more evil than all who were before him”) 

Ahab (r. 874-853) 

  • Claim: Son of Omri 
  • Prophet: Elijah, Obadiah(?) [traditional; others believe this to be a different Obadiah than the Minor Prophet] 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 16-22, 2 Chron 18 
  • Notable for: Marrying Jezebel, worshiping Baal, and getting into conflict with numerous prophets 
  • Evil or good? Very evil (“did evil in the sight of the Lord more than all who were before him”) 

Ahaziah (r. 853-852) 

  • Claim: Son of Ahab 
  • Prophet: Elijah 
  • Scripture: 1 Kings 22, 2 Kings 1 
  • Notable for: Not much; continued in his father’s way 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Jehoram/Joram (r. 852-841) 

  • Claim: Son of Ahab (Ahaziah’s brother) 
  • Prophet: Elisha 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 1,9 
  • Notable for: Removed the pillar to Baal that his father had made; war with various neighbors 
  • Evil or good? Slightly less evil 

Jehu (r. 841-814) 

  • Claim: Military commander in Joram’s army; anointed by Elisha 
  • Prophet: Elisha 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 9-10 
  • Notable for: Slaughtered Joram, Jezebel, all of Ahab’s descendants, and all priests and worshipers of Baal; smashed Baal’s temple; but kept the golden calves 
  • Evil or good? Neutral 

Jehoahaz (r. 814-798) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehu 
  • Prophet: Elisha 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 13 
  • Notable for: Humiliating defeat in battle against Aram 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Jehoash (r. 798-782) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehoahaz 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 13-14 
  • Notable for: Recovering land from Aram 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Jeroboam II (r. 782-753) 

  • Claim: Son of Jehoash 
  • Prophet: Jonah, Amos, Hosea 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 14 
  • Notable for: Long rule; restored Israel’s borders 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Zechariah (r. 753-752) 

  • Claim: Son of Jeroboam II 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Killed by Shallum, ending Jehu’s dynasty 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Shallum (r. 752) 

  • Claim: None (usurper) 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Killed by Menahem, who sacked the region of Tiphsah 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Menahem (r. 752-742) 

  • Claim: None (usurper) 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Taxed the wealthy of Israel to successfully pay off Assyrian invaders 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Pekahiah (r. 742-740) 

  • Claim: Son of Menahem 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Killed by his captain 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Pekah (r. 752-733) 

  • Claim: Pekahiah’s army captain 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 15 
  • Notable for: Lost much of his territory to King Tiglath-pileser of Assyria 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

Hoshea (r. 732-722) 

  • Claim: None (usurper) 
  • Prophet: None 
  • Scripture: 2 Kings 17 
  • Notable for: Entered vassalage to Assyria, but double-crossed King Shalmaneser and so was imprisoned, leading to the capture of Israel and the Babylonian exile 
  • Evil or good? Evil 

BABYLONIAN EXILE (722-450) 

Prophets of the Exile 

Several prophets wrote from exile in Babylon:

  • Nahum (fl. 615 BC) 
  • Ezekiel (d. 570 BC) 
  • Daniel (ca. 500s BC) 

Conclusion: Sorting Through the Kings and Prophets

I hope this guide and chart help you to sort through the bewildering array of very similar names between the kingdoms of Israel and Judah in the books of 1 and 2 Kings — and help you to better understand the history of God’s chosen people as recorded in Scripture. Now, next time someone asks you who your favorite king of Judah was, you’ll have an answer ready. 

If you enjoy these sorts of deep dives into the Bible, treat yourself to a free trial of Bible Gateway Plus, which contains dozens of study resources to help you research and understand God’s Word.

Jesus Bible Devotional 4: Act III — People

The third act in the story of God is all about his response to people. It covers hundreds of years of history and focuses specifically on how God advanced his plan to redeem people from sin during these years.

Previously, we learned that sin entered the world when Adam and Eve first disobeyed God. From that moment in the garden, people struggled mightily to follow God. But God did not abandon them. Just the opposite; God got even more involved with people. 

The Journey of the Israelites

Genesis 12 through Genesis 50 is the story of how the Israelites became a nation. It all began with God’s promise to one man, Abram. “I will make you into a great nation . . . all people on earth will be blessed through you (Genesis 12:2-3).

By Genesis 50, the Israelites were living in Egypt and their numbers were swelling far beyond the pharaoh’s comfort zone. 

As we learned in our previous devotional, the ancient Egyptians brutally enslaved the Israelites (Exodus 1). The famous story of Moses is about how God freed his people from slavery. Though generations had passed, God had not forgotten his promise to Abram or his promise to Eve that a savior would come (Genesis 3:15), and so he set the Israelites on a course to a new homeland. 

Along the way, God gave the Israelites what we know as the Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments

Read Exodus 20:1-18.

These rules were not a prerequisite for God’s love and faithfulness. The Israelites had already experienced God’s faithfulness and his miraculous power to save them.

The Ten Commandments are about how to love God (vv. 6-11) and love others (vv. 12-18).

Abiding by these commands, as well as the rest of the law, enabled the nation of Israel to live in harmony with God and bless “all people on earth,” just as God promised Abram.  

Why does all this history matter? Because God hasn’t changed. He’s still a promise-keeper. He’s still forgiving people and setting them free from what binds them. He’s still incensed by injustice (Isaiah 28:16-19), and he’s still powerful (Ephesians 1:18-21).

This is the God that created you and loves you. God loves people—including you. 

Reflection 

What were you taught about the Ten Commandments in the past? 

What do you think about the Ten Commandments being about loving God and loving others? Read Matthew 22:36-40 as you consider this. 

Is there a commandment that is especially challenging for you? Would you pray about that today? 

Prayer 

Thank you, God, for loving people, including me. Thank you for being upset by injustice and for using your power to free enslaved people. Help me, please, by your power, to love you and to love people as much as you love me. Amen.

Read the rest of the Jesus Bible Devotional series — and go deeper with the full Jesus Bible Study Series.

Encounter the living Jesus in all of Scripture through The Jesus Bible — the Bible that lifts Jesus up as the lead story and encourages you to faithfully follow him as you participate in his story. Also available as part of Bible Gateway Plus!

Holding Hope in Grief: A Lesson from Romans  

0

In the first century, people didn’t hold hope in high regard. People thought so little of it that they ridiculed others for demonstrating any semblance of hope.

Roman culture was at the center of this. In grammar school, they had kids try to limit dreaming and hoping by creating what is commonly referred to as a “hardship list,” where they would predict trials, tribulations, and suffering they could encounter in the future and write them down.

Can you imagine how traumatic that would be today if third graders had to journal their most scary and catastrophic fears, writing them down as if they were guaranteed to happen someday? 

Is Hope a Weakness?

The Romans wanted their kids to be prepared to handle the situations of hardship they knew would be part of their future. To make it in their world, you had to withstand the suffering. Emotion and sensitivity were liabilities to avoid, while reason and logic were tools for survival in Rome.

If you had hope, you ran the risk of being considered weak, because some in the ancient world believed hope to be like a moral disease (a sign of weakness). It meant you depended on a power outside yourself. 

The Hope of the Empty Tomb

If the core tenet of Christianity holds that Jesus rose from the grave, leaving his tomb empty, then who are we to decide what is and isn’t possible for God? If the tomb is empty, isn’t truth possible? Isn’t justice possible? Isn’t healing possible? Isn’t reconciliation possible?  

The answer simply must be yes. 

The empty tomb means he is risen. The empty tomb means death is not the end of the story. The empty tomb means our hope has merit, what we want is valid, and goodness in the future is possible because the resurrection brings certainty.  

I love what pastor Andy Stanley says about this: “If someone predicts their own death and resurrection and pulls it off, I go with whatever that person says.”

‘Easter People in a Good Friday World’

History tells us that Jesus wasn’t the first to claim he was the Messiah. In fact, many religious and political leaders have visited the ancient Near East and made similar claims. However, their religious movements stopped when the government or unbelievers killed them for their heresy.  

Until Jesus.  

When he died, the government expected the Jesus movement to die with him. But then he changed everything and conquered death. As author Barbara Johnson wrote, his resurrection encouraged his disciples to live as “Easter people living in a Good Friday world.” Because Jesus conquered death, we can live as people of hope and resurrection in a world where good and innocent people get hurt. 

Dare to Hope

The resurrection changes everything, and Paul said the same power that raised Jesus from the grave is within each of us (Romans 8:11). 

I don’t just desire something good. 

I don’t just believe anything is possible. 

Resurrection brings the certainty to expect that good is on its way. 

Romans 8:28 says, “All things work together for good to them that love God” (KJV).  

All things. Even when we’re grieving, and it feels impossible. 

But slowly, I began to hold space for grief and hope.  

Hope is the confident expectation that good is on its way. 

Paul wrote in Romans 5:2–5, “We boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame.” 

Remember what ancient Rome taught: 

Hardship is coming. 

Suffering will happen. 

Prepare for it. 

When Paul said that we must persevere and prioritize character development, the church in Rome would have nodded in agreement. However, when he said that everything produces a hope that no one can shame, he lost them. A statement like that was groundbreaking. He was reframing, reminding, and reclaiming the sheer goodness of hope.

He was daring to hope, and we can too. 


Adapted from Grieve, Breathe, Receive by Steve Carter.

What do you do when your world seems to be falling down all around you? When loss is too much to bear? When disappointment becomes your new reality? Pastor Steve Carter is certain you’ll find hope and life through these three simple yet profound steps: Grieve. Breathe. Receive. 

Cover of Grieve, Breathe, Receive by Steve Carter

Grieve, Breathe, Receive

In 2018, in light of further misconduct allegations against Willow Creek Community Church founder and senior pastor Bill Hybels, Steve Carter announced publicly that he was resigning from his dream job as a lead pastor at that church. After posting his resignation online, he turned off all of his devices and began to weep on his wife’s shoulder.

The next morning as he was taking a walk to process all the thoughts and feelings tumbling around in his mind, he cried out to Jesus in desperation, begging for an answer. “What am I supposed to do now?”

He expected nothing but the silence that had overwhelmed him since hitting send on his message to the world, but before he could take two steps, a gentle whisper impressed three words upon his heart: grieve, breathe, receive.

In this book, Steve is more personal and vulnerable than he’s ever been, and by doing so he encourages all of us to: 

  • Allow ourselves the necessary time and space to properly GRIEVE what is, what you thought it was going to be and how key people let you down rather than fill our days with activities and commitments that distract us. 
  • Slow down to BREATHE in God’s grace, His peace, and His love . . . and to learn how to exhale all the negativity, pain, resentment, and bitterness we carry within us. 
  • Be open to RECEIVE all the lessons, surprises, and healing God knows we need for every part of us to be made whole. 

This process of grieving, breathing, and receiving was a life-restoring gift from God for Steve and his family, and he is certain that it will bless anyone who prayerfully follows it. 

Grieve, Breathe, Receive is published by HarperCollins Christian Publishing, Inc., the parent company of Bible Gateway. 

Look at the Book: 2 Samuel [Infographic] 

Welcome to Bible Gateway’s weekly Look at the Book series of short blog posts and infographics introducing you to the books of the Bible. Let’s continue through the story of David and the unification of Israel with 2 Samuel

Scroll to the bottom if you’d prefer to see (and save) this article as an infographic. You’ll also find a handy 30-day reading guide. Or, for a challenge, you can do it in one week using the 7-day reading guide below. 

Summary 

Continues the story of Israel as they transitioned from the time of the judges to the monarchy, beginning with the death of King Saul and David’s ascension to the throne. 

  • Category: History 
  • Theme: Unification 
  • Timeline: About 1000-970 BC 
  • Written: No clear indication of author or date of composition 

Key Verse 

“Your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever.” — 2 Samuel 7:16 (NIV) 

Highs and Lows 

2 Samuel depicts the high points of David’s forty-year reign, and the low points of his life. 

In fulfillment of Nathan’s prophecy that David’s sin with Bathsheba would split the house of David, we see the consequences unfold, bringing division and suffering not only to David’s household but to the entire nation of Israel. 

7 Day Reading Guide 

(See 30-day guide below.) 

Consider 

The events of David’s life recorded in Samuel foreshadow the actions of David’s greater Son (Christ) in the future. 

Access the rest of the series here. Browse Bible studies for each book of the Bible. Or right-click on the infographic below to download and save the image for your reference.   

Infographic depicting major themes and content from 2 Samuel

Who Wrote the Bible? Traditional Views and Modern Scholarship 

0

Like most questions about Scripture, the answer to “who wrote the Bible” is complex and multifaceted. There’s much disagreement even among Christians about many of the details. 

But here’s what nearly everyone can agree on: 

  1. The Bible was written over hundreds of years by many different hands in a variety of genres and in several different languages.  
  2. Each of these writers was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit to deliver their testimony — whether it was worship poetry, history, prophecy, biography, or another format.

To dig deeper into the question of who wrote the Bible, this post will look at the concept of “inspiration” and the different ways Christians interpret it.  

We’ll then look at the broad-stroke differences between traditional viewpoints and modern scholarship on Biblical authorship, followed by a survey of traditional and academic viewpoints on who wrote each book of the Bible

Did God Write the Bible, or Inspire It? 

Most Christians across time, place, and denomination believe that the Bible was written by humans who were inspired by God to gradually reveal his story and plan for creation — first through the Israelite people in the Old Testament, and then through Jesus Christ and the apostles in the New Testament.  

Banner reading "Bible Gateway Plus, Less Than $5.00 per month, Free Trial"

In other words, God may have “dictated” the Bible in some form (see below), but most Christians do not believe that he himself wrote it. 

The precise meaning of “inspiration” can vary quite a bit, though, depending on who you ask. Here’s how — and why. 

Inspired: Breathing God’s Spirit 

Take a look at the word “inspired” — in/spir/ed. It comes from the same Latin word as “spirit” — spirare, which originally meant “breath.” And, since the Hebrew word for “breath” also means “wind,” it also connects the Holy Spirit to God’s “breath” or “wind” across the water in Genesis 1

(Theology nerd side note: In the Middle Ages, the association of God’s Word with both the Bible and the creative act in Genesis — based on passages such as Romans 1:20 — gave rise to the idea of God’s “Book of Scripture” and “Book of Nature” as both attesting equally to Jesus as God’s Word in John 1.) 

So “inspired” means God “breathed into” the recipients of his Word. Or, to put it another way, the Spirit was in them (cf. 2 Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 1:21). 

Now, because the words of Scripture were inspired by God, it follows that they are fundamentally true — or infallible. Where the disagreement sometimes arises is how they are true. 

Infallible: Three (or So) Views on God’s Truth in Scripture 

When it comes to God’s Word being “inspired and infallible,” some Christians believe each word was given directly by God and written down verbatim, while others believe that the Bible’s writers were guided by God’s spirit to compose their works.  

These two positions result in different approaches to how believers interpret and engage with the Bible. 

Neither Added nor Subtracted (Deut. 4:2, Rev. 22:18-19) 

Today, many American Christians use the word “inerrant” to describe the Bible — that is, it is completely free from error, in whole and in part, and was received and written exactly as God intended by the people he chose, while preserving their individual personalities and styles. This is often called verbal plenary inspiration

A variant is verbal dictation, in which God directly spoke each word of the Bible and people simply wrote them down as-is. However, this is a minority viewpoint.  

(In fact, this is why Christianity has traditionally been much more friendly to translation of Scripture than most other religions such as Islam, which often insist that the language in which their scriptures were “revealed” is the only genuine way to read them.) 

The Spirit, Not the Letter (2 Cor. 3:4-6) 

Other Christians believe that, while the Bible is absolutely true, there may be elements in it that are not entirely accurate.  

This may be because, while the ideas, themes, and narratives of Scripture were inspired in the writers by God, he allowed them to write the words themselves — a position known as dynamic inspiration.  

Or, it could be that parts of the Bible (i.e., matters of faith and morality) were directly inspired, while other parts (such as history and science) were left up to the writers, based on their own personal and cultural understandings — aka, partial inspiration

Finally, there are some Christians who believe the Bible was written simply by wise human writers, and “inspiration” is just symbolic language reflecting their wisdom, which was ultimately received from God. This is sometimes known as intuition theory. But, like the verbal dictation theory above, it is a minority viewpoint. 

Upon This Rock (Matt. 16:18-19) 

It should be noted that this conversation is largely a concern of Protestantism (whether evangelical or mainline), and especially American Protestants, as a result of the doctrine of sola scriptura — i.e., that the Bible is the sole source of divine revelation. 

Catholic and Orthodox churches agree that the Bible is inspired and infallible. However, since they also assert the Spirit’s continued activity in the church through apostolic succession (that is, the authority invested in Peter by Jesus in Matt. 16:18-19 and passed down through the generations), their concerns are more about interpreting the Bible in alignment and concordance with church teachings and tradition, rather than how it ought to be understood on its own terms.  

For Catholics, what is known as the “Magisterium” — the church’s divine authority to rule on all matters of faith — has the final say in Biblical interpretation. For Orthodox, interpretation is based on the traditions established by the councils, particularly the Seven Ecumenical Councils of the 4th through 8th centuries AD.

Traditional and Modern Views on Biblical Authorship 

So, barring views such as verbal dictation and intuition theory, by far most Christians believe that the Bible was written by human beings inspired one way or another by God.  

But which human beings? 

For most books of the Bible, there is a traditional popular view of who the author or authors were, and for many of them, there is a somewhat different guess based on modern (or ancient) research. 

  • Traditional authorship is typically based either on a self-ascription in the text (e.g., Song of Songs 1:1), or a cross-reference from another Biblical text (e.g., Lamentations and 2 Chronicles 35:25), or extra-Biblical teachings (typically from the Jewish writings called the Talmud — e.g., Moses writing the Pentateuch). 
  • Modern scholarship attempts to establish Biblical authorship by taking a step back from the traditional understanding, conducting a very close read of various versions of each book (e.g., Hebrew, Greek, Syriac, etc.), and comparing it to other contemporary works both in and outside of the Bible.  

Modern scholarship doesn’t always identify a different author than tradition. Often they simply leave it as “anonymous.” Establishing authorship from an academic perspective is complicated by the tendency of ancient authors to: 

  1. edit and combine texts together,  
  2. write under someone else’s name as a way to honor them (sort of how we use “dedications” today), and  
  3. put down in writing things that had been transmitted orally for generations or even centuries.

These issues are especially challenging in the prophets. In many cases it’s difficult to tell how much of the text is from the original prophet and how much, if any, was added later. 

Regardless, it’s important to understand that none of these habits were seen as suspicious in the ancient world the way we might view them today, and none suggest on their own that those authors and editors could not all have been divinely inspired — as was indeed the traditional view. (See the section on traditional scholarship below.) 

Either way, it’s ultimately up to the individual reader and believer to read, study, talk to their pastors, and decide which story seems the most convincing. (Or, on the other hand, allow the anonymity of the Biblical writers to speak for itself.) 

What About Traditional Scholarship? 

It’s sometimes supposed that it took modern secular scholars to finally point out inconsistencies in Scripture that had somehow been missed for nearly two millennia. But as early as the 2nd century AD, Christian theologians were grappling with such passages (after all, these guys often had the entire Bible memorized front to back — often in its original languages). 

For example, the Epistle to the Hebrews was ascribed to Paul by many in the early church — but as early as the 3rd and 4th centuries century AD, authorities such as Origen and Eusebius were already noting how little its style resembled Paul’s. Today, the epistle is most often considered to be from one of Paul’s close associates or students, but probably not from the Apostle himself. 

Who Wrote Each Book of the Bible? (Traditional and Modern Views) 

With all of that in mind, here is a list of each book of the Bible, with the traditional and modern views of their authorship. 

Old Testament 

Torah/Pentateuch (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy) 

  • Traditional author: Moses (Talmud) 
  • Modern theories: Probably a combination of multiple oral sources (one of whom may have been Moses) 

Joshua 

  • Traditional: Joshua (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Calvin rejected Joshua as the author; consensus today is an anonymous Deuteronomistic historian during the time of Josiah or later 

Judges 

  • Traditional: Anonymous 
  • Modern: Deuteronomistic historian compiling written and oral sources 

Ruth 

  • Traditional: Samuel (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Anonymous 

1 & 2 Samuel 

  • Traditional: Samuel, Nathan, and Gad (1 Chron. 29:29-30
  • Modern: Deuteronomistic historian compiling of written oral sources 

1 & 2 Kings 

  • Traditional: Jeremiah (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Anonymous historian compiling written and oral sources 

1 & 2 Chronicles 

  • Traditional: Ezra/Nehemiah (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Levite priests probably writing (or compiling) post-exile 

Ezra/Nehemiah 

  • Traditional: Ezra  
  • Modern: Ezra and/or a later compiler 

Esther 

  • Traditional: Mordecai and a later editor (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Anonymous writer 

Job 

  • Traditional: Moses? (Talmud) 
  • Modern: Anonymous writer 

Psalms 

  • Traditional: Various composers including David, Solomon, Asaph, and more 
  • Modern: Various composers possibly including the above 

Proverbs 

Ecclesiastes 

Song of Songs 

  • Traditional: Solomon (Song 1:1
  • Modern: Anonymous writer or compiler 

Isaiah 

  • Traditional: Isaiah (Is. 1:1
  • Modern: Isaiah and possibly other prophets (disciples?) prophesying under his name, and/or writing down and compiling his and others’ verbal prophecies long after his death 

Jeremiah 

  • Traditional: Jeremiah (Jer. 1:1-3
  • Modern: Jeremiah and possibly others writing down and/or compiling various material sometime after his death 

Lamentations  

Ezekiel 

  • Traditional: Ezekiel (Ez. 1:3
  • Modern: Ezekiel, possibly compiled by his disciples 

Daniel 

  • Traditional: Daniel and anonymous narrator 
  • Modern: Various authors over time, possibly including Daniel (Dn. 2-6) and other scribes (Dn. 1, 7-12) 

Hosea 

  • Traditional: Hosea (Hos. 1:1
  • Modern: Hosea and maybe others 

Joel 

  • Traditional: Joel (Jl. 1:1
  • Modern: Joel and maybe others 

Amos 

  • Traditional: Amos (Am. 1:1
  • Modern: Amos and maybe others 

Obadiah 

  • Traditional: Obadiah (Ob. 1:1
  • Modern: Obadiah 

Jonah 

  • Traditional: Anonymous narrator 
  • Modern: Anonymous narrator probably satirizing prophetic behavior 

Micah 

  • Traditional: Micah (Mic. 1:1
  • Modern: Micah and probably others 

Nahum 

  • Traditional: Nahum (Na. 1:1
  • Modern: Nahum and maybe others 

Habakkuk 

  • Traditional: Habakkuk (Hab. 1:1
  • Modern: Nahum and maybe others 

Zephaniah 

  • Traditional: Zephaniah (Zeph. 1:1
  • Modern: Zephaniah and maybe others 

Haggai 

  • Traditional: Haggai (Hag. 1:1
  • Modern: Haggai 

Zechariah 

  • Traditional: Zechariah (Zech. 1:1
  • Modern: Zechariah (Zech. 1-8) and maybe others (Zech. 9-14) 

Malachi 

  • Traditional: Malachi (Mal. 1:1
  • Modern: Malachi 

New Testament 

Matthew 

  • Traditional: Matthew 
  • Modern: Matthew or another (second-generation?) follower of Jesus 

Mark 

  • Traditional: Mark 
  • Modern: Mark 

Luke 

  • Traditional: Luke the “beloved physician” (Col. 4:14
  • Modern: Luke (probably) 

John 

  • Traditional: John the son of Zebedee (identified with the “Beloved Disciple” by Irenaeus in 2nd century AD; cf. John 13:23–26, etc.) 
  • Modern: Probably John the son of Zebedee, but the “Beloved Disciple” could be John the Elder, Lazarus, or someone else 

Acts of the Apostles 

  • Traditional: Luke 
  • Modern: Luke 

Romans 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

1 & 2 Corinthians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

Galatians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

Ephesians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul or a Pauline disciple 

Philippians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

Colossians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

1 & 2 Thessalonians 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul (or maybe a Pauline disciple for 2 Thess.) 

1 & 2 Timothy 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul or a later Pauline disciple 

Titus 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul or a later Pauline disciple 

Philemon 

  • Traditional: Paul 
  • Modern: Paul 

Hebrews 

  • Traditional: Unknown — guesses included Paul, Barnabas, Stephen, Apollos, and Priscilla 
  • Modern: Unknown — probably not Paul, but maybe Silas, Apollos, or Priscilla

James 

  • Traditional: James the Just, brother of Jesus 
  • Modern: James the brother of Jesus, or another James 

1 & 2 Peter 

  • Traditional: Peter 
  • Modern: Peter or a later disciple 

1, 2 & 3 John 

  • Traditional: John the son of Zebedee (the “beloved disciple” and author of John’s gospel) 
  • Modern: John the son of Zebedee, a later disciple, or another John 

Jude 

  • Traditional: Jude, brother of James and Jesus 
  • Modern: Jude (probably) 

Revelation 

  • Traditional: John the son of Zebedee (now aka John of Patmos due to his exile) 
  • Modern: John of Patmos, but there’s some debate about whether he was the same John as the author of the Gospel and Letters of John 

Conclusion: Who Wrote the Bible 

The Bible is the inspired and infallible Word of God, written by many people over hundreds of years from more than 1,000 years before Christ’s birth to about 70 years after his death.  

That’s the simple version. As to what “inspired” and “infallible” mean, and who each of those people were — I hope this article has given you the tools to better understand the issues at stake. Through prayerful research and discussions with your pastor and/or study group, you can reach your own conclusions. 

Ultimately, though, what matters is not so much who wrote the Bible, but how you read it, engage with it, and let it speak to you in your own life. 

Bible Gateway Plus can help you more deeply engage with the Bible both spiritually and academically, with dozens of study resources to help you better understand the origins of God’s Word and its transformative power in your life today. 

Jesus Bible Devotional 3: Act II — Revolt

If you’ve ever felt like you’re too sinful to be loved by God, then spend some time reading the Bible. The Bible is a record book of some epic sinning.

In just the fourth chapter, one brother murders another in a jealous rage (Genesis 4). The Egyptians brutally enslaved the Israelites and committed infanticide (Exodus 1). The Pharisees and Sadducees distorted God’s law and exploited their positions of power (Matthew 3:7-10). Even David, a man whom God appointed as King over Israel, raped and murdered (2 Samuel 11).  

Separated from God…

So, Act II in God’s story is called Revolt because it’s about how sin creates a separation between humanity and God that we cannot repair.

“Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned…” — Romans 5:12 (NIV)

God’s image-bearing creation — humans — revolted against their loving creator, condemning ourselves to eternity without him. It started in the Garden of Eden when Adam and Eve deliberately disobeyed God’s command (Genesis 3:1-8). As today’s passage says, “sin entered the world,” through them and “death came to all people, because all sinned.” 

…and Pursued by Him

But this act in God’s story contains some good news, too.

As soon as Adam and Eve committed that first sin, God began to pursue them. He immediately set a plan in motion for their redemption, promising that one day, a savior would come (Genesis 3:15).

God still pursues and redeems sinners.

If you take a minute to honestly, quietly reflect upon your life, you can probably think of sinful things you’ve done. Lies you’ve told. Things you’ve stolen. Times when you’ve treated others cruelly. Scripture is clear, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23).

But just as God provided for Adam and Eve, just as he freed the Israelites and forgave King David, so God will free, forgive, and provide for you, too. While we revolt, God redeems. 

Reflection 

When has sin made it feel like God was far away? What did you do? 

Can you think of something you want to confess to God right now? 

Read 1 John 1:9. Take a minute and meditate on how God has forgiven you of your sin.

Prayer 

Dear God, THANK YOU for forgiving me. You know what I’ve done. You know how far I can stray sometimes, yet you love me and forgive me. Thank you for seeking me out when I’m hiding in shame. Thank you for being a god who frees and forgives! Amen. 

Read the rest of the Jesus Bible Devotional series — and go deeper with the full Jesus Bible Study Series.

Encounter the living Jesus in all of Scripture through The Jesus Bible — the Bible that lifts Jesus up as the lead story and encourages you to faithfully follow him as you participate in his story. Also available as part of Bible Gateway Plus!

The Spirit and Circle of Divisiveness Today: A Lesson from Corinth

In the backdrop leading up to Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, the church at Corinth — which means a collection of house churches in Corinth — fell into divisions and factions.

Some of their divisions were over Paul. It looks like some preferred Apollos and others Peter. Each faction knew it was right, and the others, especially Paul, were wrong. We need to describe that divisiveness, but I will do so with an eye on divisions in churches today.

8 Points on the Circle of Division

Many churches have suffered from a bout or two (or more) with divisiveness. The spirit of divisiveness remains consistent from group to group. What follows has been aided by more than a half dozen pastors who read this article, commented on it, and gave me feedback. One pastor who read this wrote me a note to say this sketch was prophetic in that it described to a T what occurred in his institution. 

First, Two ‘Nots’

Briefly, two ‘nots’:

Disagreements over decisions made by leaders are not the same as division. Disagreements can become divisive. When discussion with the leader does not accomplish what a person wants to happen, a seed is sown that can lead to division. Learning to tolerate and process differences and disagreements is a mark of a healthy church.

Uniformity from the leader throughout a church is not the same as unity. Uniformity is coerced and is top-down; unity is Spirit-prompted and celebrates diversity and difference.

1. Power, Status, Honor 

First, in Corinth, the heartbeat of the divisive group was the quest for status and honor. It was a zero-sum game driven by a scarcity mindset. That is, if you got the glory, I didn’t.

In our world, that sense of honor comes to expression in the rarely stated desire for power, for authority, and for control. The dividers want to be in charge, and they use discord to pave their path to power. When power is understood, as it often is, as authority over and power over, the culture is set for divisiveness to appear.

A desire to seize or work for power over a church often flows from a grievance or slight, an act of a leader making a decision the aggrieved didn’t like, and a grudge forms that prompts the person to retaliate.

Freedom and Authoritarianism

One of the watchwords for the divisive is freedom, which is as Christian as it is American. The watchword of freedom usually gets an echo in a charge of authoritarianism on the part of those they think ought not to be in power. Behind closed doors the divisive will use terms like “autocrat,” “tyrant,” and “dictator.”

The plea by the divisive for freedom is their smokescreen for power. If they do win, as soon as the divisive gain power, they squash the freedom of those whom they fought against. Those who complain the most about unchecked power are those wanting the power for themselves.

Nearly all the divisive either diminish their participation or hide from accountability and responsibility for what they have done. Those who set the place on fire and then escape are not deemed heroes for escaping. Division and the power desired by the divisive are fleshly and unspiritual. Virtue and divisiveness cannot hold hands.

2. Clique and Coalition 

Second, disagreement becomes divisive when discussion(s) with the leader or leaders does not lead to what the critic wants. A desire for power begins to build a coalition that turns into a clique of like-minded disrupters who go to battle against the leaders.

A theme is the old adage: “an enemy of my enemy is a friend.” Friends in the tribe like this can be found by dropping little gossips into a conversation to see who might bite. Unlikely but very superficial relations form in these coalitions.

Take Care to Avoid Disruptive Groups

People in the church need to become aware of the danger of passive participation in such groups. Not speaking up about the circle of division, when they are noticed, puts a person in the pocket. Hence, a pocket of division, a tribalism, occurs in a church when a disruptive group is formed.

Often, such a group creates a sense of chaos, discord, and disunity in the church; the sense that things are out of control. The church leadership will experience division as a struggle for power with others, and the leadership will often need to take action. Disunifiers are shaped by the flesh. 

3. Politicizing Tension Points 

Third, the tension points become politicized. They become zero-sum games.

Far too often the tension points are minor issues depicted as major gospel problems. They then become determinative for the divisions. But a wedge can be pressed into service to divide groups over some point. Before long, that point becomes the point, regardless of its theological and practical importance.

Sides are then taken over the tension point. God is with them; God is against the pastor or leader they want to dismiss. Everything then gets connected to the tension point. He chose—as the leader, as one with the institutional authority to do so, as one who thought he or she had good reasons for the decision—to release a staff member.

Disagreement by the circle of division resorts to the language of “tyranny” or “dictatorship,” then tyranny becomes the rally cry. Or “heresy” or “false teacher” when the tension point is some truly minor issue in theology or Bible interpretation. What is truly minor and what is major often are confused in the faction of division. Malice and the desire for power drive politicizing these tension points. 

4. Leader of the Clique 

Fourth, someone leads in nearly all divisions that occur in a church. The person, since he or she wants power, often reveals signs of narcissism. Be warned: it’s easy to use the term, but it’s a diagnosis that requires a professional.

People with narcissistic tendencies are noted by selfishness, a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, bold and bald using of others, attracting sycophants, a hypersensitivity to criticism, and especially a desire for personal admiration and glory. When someone over them makes a decision they don’t like, the narcissist will diminish the person who made the choice.

Remember, the leader of a circle of division wants power. His associates, which at times become nothing less than allegiance, want him or her to have power. Someone, or perhaps a small inner circle, steers the ship of division. Such persons degrade leaders in order to build themselves up.

Oppose Divisive Leaders

The leader and his inner circle need to be called out for leading the sins of arrogance and division. Opposing the leader of a division is right and good. Some divisive persons love disruption and destruction for no other reason than they love chaos and do not like to be in a system that contains them.

The participants in the circle of division usually deny or diminish the very criticisms that describe them. They often then turn the same criticisms onto those who resist their divisiveness. 

5. Words 

Fifth, the primary modes of operation for the circle of division include gossip about leaders or others, arguing with the leaders, questioning the credentials and ability of the leaders, the desire to attract others in the church to their circle, creating a culture of complaining or “sealioning,” backstabbing and degrading leaders, and labeling the leader with demeaning terms. Labels and names that ridicule often form in the circle of division for those on the outside.

Often this circle of division will scapegoat one person or a few persons as the entire problem. Scapegoating, which is very much like canceling, leads to demonizing. None of these verbal habits emerge from the fruit of the Spirit. 

6. End Justifies the Means 

Sixth, the circle of division will work together against the leader(s) in order to dismantle authority, degrade the leader(s), and work to get the leader(s) dismissed. Following the procedures matters far less than the desired result of dismissal. For them the end justifies the means.

When dismissed, the leaders in the circle of division, realizing the depth of their dirty work, often express sadness but internally delight in their victory. Their togetherness strengthens the divisive group’s sense of being right.

But togetherness does not make division right. Their togetherness means only that they are now a faction of the flesh. Good leaders will need to counter these activities to discover the nature and content of the division, and to counter the fleshly divisions. 

7. Their Own Narrative 

Seventh, in working together and thinking they are right, the circle of division tells itself a story: it forms its own narrative of the church or institution, claims the high road, refuses to admit their gossip, quotes the Bible for their viewpoints, and contends they are fighting for justice.

The circle of division will nearly always tell some truths. Those truths are usually exaggerated or distorted. Only an independent observer, someone marked by wisdom and social perception, can root out the most accurate narrative. Most of the time, the dividers don’t even know the deeper, more accurate narrative. 

8. Grandstanding 

Eighth, the circle of power, and especially its leader, participate in grandstanding, which is a desire to be perceived as virtuous prompted by publicly affirming their own virtues (see Tosi and Warmke, Grandstanding).

They may host a dinner at one of their homes where they can affirm one another. They may even go to social media. What matters is that they want to be affirmed for the very moral claims they make while bragging about their actions.

Here is a definition of grandstanding from a study by philosophy professors Justin Tosi and Brandon Warmke:

  • Grandstanders want to impress others with their moral qualities. We call this the Recognition Desire
  • Grandstanders try to satisfy that desire by saying something in public moral discourse. We call this public display the Grandstanding Expression.  
  • You can therefore think of grandstanding in terms of a simple formula: 
  • Grandstanding = Recognition Desire + Grandstanding Expression 
  • Grandstanders try to get others to think of them as morally respectable. Sometimes they want to be thought of as one of the gang. Other times, they want to be thought of as morally exceptional. Either way, they usually want to be seen as morally better than others (Tosi, Warmke, Grandstanding, 15). 

When the circle of division, with its strong leaders guiding the circle, doesn’t get its way, some leave, some continue to fight until they get what they want, and some learn the lesson that cliques deny the gospel itself. The first four chapters of 1 Corinthians, not to ignore other passages in Paul’s letters, can provide guidance for leaders facing factions in their church or organization. 

Pockets of Tov

I have assumed in the above that Paul was more or less on the side of the angels and that his opponents in Corinth were opposing what was good. At times, a pocket forms that is itself the good culture. That pocket of tov (or goodness) opposes a toxic leader or leadership.

1 Corinthians: Living Together in a Church Divided by Scot McKnight book cover

However, how pockets of tov behave in comparison to a circle of division (a pocket of toxicity and power mongering) is completely different, even if resistance and dissidence and disagreements are common to both groups. 

To learn more, read 1 Corinthians: Living Together in a Church Divided, a Bible commentary by Scot McKnight, in which he explains the historical context of Corinth’s divided churches, connects the book to the larger story of the Bible, and provides parallels that bring the story alive to us today.

1 Corinthians: Living Together in a Church Divided is published by HarperCollins Christian Publishing, which is also the parent company of Bible Gateway.

Look at the Book: 1 Samuel [Infographic] 

Welcome to Bible Gateway’s weekly Look at the Book series of short blog posts and infographics introducing you to the books of the Bible. In this post we’ll dive into the first half of the Samuel scroll, known in modern Bibles as 1 Samuel

Scroll to the bottom if you’d prefer to see (and save) this article as an infographic. You’ll also find a handy 30-day reading guide. Or, for a challenge, you can do it in one week using the 7-day reading guide below. 

Summary 

The people refuse to listen to God and make the rough transition from the time of the judges to the reign of Saul, whom God calls Samuel to anoint as Israel’s first earthly king. 

  • Category: History 
  • Theme: Kingship 
  • Timeline: About 1100-1000 BC 
  • Written: No clear indication of author or date of composition 

Key Verse 

“The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.” — 1 Samuel 16:7 (NIV) 

A King in Israel 

The events covered in 1 Samuel span the sovereignty of God answering Hannah’s prayer for a son, to allowing the Philistines to defeat Israel, to the Israelites’ demand for a king, to David slaying the giant and becoming the rightful king of Israel. 

7 Day Reading Guide 

(See 30-day guide below.) 

Consider 

The books of 1 and 2 Samuel span about 135 years of history. During those years, Israel was transformed from a loosely knit group of tribes under judges to a united nation under the reign of a centralized monarchy. 

Access the rest of the series here. Browse Bible studies for each book of the Bible. Or right-click on the infographic below to download and save the image for your reference.   

Infographic depicting major themes and content from 1 Samuel

Jesus Bible Devotional 2: Act I — Beginnings

How many empty words do you think you’ve spoken in your lifetime? All of us are guilty of them. We mumble (or rage) in our cars about traffic. We make cutting, derisive comments about spouses or other family members under our breath. We complain openly about our bosses and gossip about others. We may not do all of these, but if we’re truly honest with ourselves, we’re all guilty of empty words. 

Undoubtedly, you have also suffered because of someone else’s empty words. The parent who brushed you off when you needed love and attention. The partner who flippantly wounded you. The abuse of someone who aimed to hurt you. Everyone has suffered somehow. 

God’s Words Are Never Empty

From the start of Act I, the story reveals something unique about God: his words are never empty. God’s words create (Genesis 1). God’s words bring life and love (Genesis 2). God’s words share wisdom (Proverbs 2:6-8). Years later, the disciple John actually calls Jesus “the Word,” who “was God” and “with God in the beginning” (John 1:1-2). 

During this week-long overview of God’s story, pay special attention to the creative, loving, wisdom-sharing nature of Jesus, the living Word of God. Jesus plays a role in every story throughout the Bible. Though humanity is filled with empty words and destructive speech, God is not. Through Jesus, “all things were made,” and “in him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind” (John 1:3-4).  

Reflection 

Read Psalm 33:6-9.

How does this Psalm affect your understanding of the nature of God? What does it reveal about him? 

Do you believe that God will never use his words to tear you down? Why or why not? 

Can you think of a time when you’ve been ridiculed, shamed, or lied to? Would you share that pain with God today through prayer?  

Prayer 

Dear God, thank you for being loving, creative, and wise. Thank you for beginning your story with creativity and life. Please fix the broken places where the words of others have wounded me. Please speak to me again and again, and enable my spirit to hear your voice. Amen. 

Read the rest of the Jesus Bible Devotional series — and go deeper with the full Jesus Bible Study Series.

Encounter the living Jesus in all of Scripture through The Jesus Bible — the Bible that lifts Jesus up as the lead story and encourages you to faithfully follow him as you participate in his story. Also available as part of Bible Gateway Plus!